Boston Immigration Lawyer and Criminal Attorney with Experience, Boston Massachusetts

Serving the community for more than 20 years.

617-303-2600
In-Person Appointment Covid-19 Safety Protocol
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Newsletter
  • Media
  • Contact Us
Boston Immigration Lawyers
Boston Criminal Lawyers
Boston Personal Injury Lawyers
Logo
617-303-2600 Appointment Request
Logo
617-303-2600 Appointment Request
  • Home
  • Immigration
    • U.S. Residency – Green Card
      • Family Residency / Green Card
      • Marriage Residency / Green Card for Spouse
      • Same Sex Marriage Residency / Green Card for Same Sex Spouse
      • Employment Residency / Green Card
      • TPS to Green Card
    • Cancellation of Removal/Deportation (10 Year Law)
    • DACA (Deferred Action Program for Young Immigrants)
    • Immigration Pardons – I-601 and I-601A Waivers
    • Expansion of I-601A Waiver, as of 8-29-2016
    • Asylum Immigration
    • TPS (Temporary Protected Status)
    • Lawsuits Against the USCIS
    • U.S. Visas- Non-Immigrant Visas
      • H-1B Visa Specialty Occupation Work Visa
      • E-1 Visa & E-2 Visa for Investors and Traders
      • L-1 Visa for Intra-Company Transfers
      • K-1 Visa for Alien Fiancé (e)
      • The U Visa – for Victims of Crime & Domestic Violence
      • O Visas for Foreigners of Outstanding Abilities
    • U.S. Citizenship – Naturalization
    • Other Immigration Services
    • Immigration Client Success Stories
    • Immigration Client Testimonials
    • U.S. Immigration FAQs
    • Immigration Legal Fees
    • Immigration Application Schedule
    • Immigration Infographics
    • Immigration Videos
    • Trump’s Proclamation Suspending Entry of Certain Immigrants
    • Immigration Newsletters and USCIS Updates
    • Visa Extensions and Extensions of Stay
    • Unemployment Benefits for Immigrants
    • Schedule Initial Consultation
  • Criminal
    • Experience with Criminal Charges
    • Set Bail and Arraignment
    • What To Do/Say When Arrested
    • Individual Rights
    • Criminal Convictions and Immigration
    • Criminal Defense FAQs
    • Client Success Stories
    • Criminal Defense Legal Fees
    • Criminal Defense / Immigration Infographic
    • Criminal Defense Newsletters
    • Schedule Initial Consultation
  • Personal Injury
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Other Injuries
    • Personal Injury Claim Process
    • Client Success Stories
    • Why Choose Us
    • Personal Injury FAQs
    • Personal Injury Legal Fees
    • Personal Injury Infographic
    • Personal Injury Newsletters
    • Schedule Initial Consultation
  • Client Reviews
    • What Our Clients Say
    • Client Ratings
    • Video Client Testimonials
    • Customer Satisfaction Survey
    • Facebook Testimonials
    • Client Succes Stories
    • Write/Read Client Reviews
  • About Us
    • Our Firm
    • Our Team
    • Firm Overview & Mission
    • Our 5 Principles
    • Working Philosophy
    • Practice Areas
    • Video Client Testimonials
    • Why Hire Us
    • Our Fee Structure
    • Preparing to Meet With Us
    • Intake Form for Consultation
    • Communication Policy
    • Records Management and Retention Policy
    • Published Court Decisions
    • Client Success Stories
    • Check Our Events
    • Customer Satisfaction Survey
    • Careers
    • Send Us Your Feedback
    • Directions to Our Office
    • Blog
  • Newsletters
    • Immigration News
    • Criminal Defense News
    • Personal Injury News
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Contact Us
Schedule Initial Consultation
Cambiar a Español
In-Person Appointment Covid-19 Safety Protocol
Immigration
Criminal
Personal Injury
  • Español
  • FAQs
  • Newsletter
  • Media
  • Contact Us
  • Immigration
    • U.S. Residency – Green Card
      • Family Residency / Green Card
      • Marriage Residency / Green Card for Spouse
      • Same Sex Marriage Residency / Green Card for Same Sex Spouse
      • Employment Residency / Green Card
      • TPS to Green Card
      • Cancellation of Removal/Deportation (10 Year Law)
      • DACA (Deferred Action Program for Young Immigrants)
      • Immigration Pardons – I-601 and I-601A Waivers
      • Expansion of I-601A Waiver, as of 8-29-2016
      • Asylum Immigration
    • U.S. Visas- Non-Immigrant Visas
      • H-1B Visa Specialty Occupation Work Visa
      • E-1 and E-2 Visas for Traders & Investors
      • L-1 Visa for Intra-Company Transfers
      • K-1 Visa for Alien Fiancé (e)
      • The U Visa – for Victims of Crime & Domestic Violence
      • O Visas for Foreigners of Outstanding Abilities
      • TPS (Temporary Protected Status)
      • Lawsuits Against the U.S. Immigration Service (USCIS)
    • U.S. Citizenship – Naturalization
      • Other Immigration Services
      • U.S. Immigration FAQs
      • Client Success Stories
      • Immigration Legal Fees
      • Immigration Client Testimonials
      • Immigration Infographics
      • Immigration Videos
      • Immigration Application Schedule
      • Immigration Newsletters and USCIS Updates
      • Visa Extensions and Extensions of Stay
      • Unemployment Benefits for Immigrants
      • Trump’s Proclamation Suspending Entry of Certain Immigrants
      • Schedule Initial Consultation
  • Criminal
    • Experience with Criminal Charges
    • Set Bail and Arraignment
    • What To Do/Say When Arrested
    • Individual Rights
    • Criminal Convictions and Immigration
    • Sealing a Criminal Record and Immigration Applications
    • Criminal Defense FAQs
    • Client Success Stories
    • Criminal Defense Legal Fees
    • Criminal Defense / Immigration Infographic
    • Schedule Initial Consultation
  • Personal Injury
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
    • Other Injuries
    • Personal Injury Claim Process
    • Client Success Stories
    • Why Choose Us
    • Personal Injury FAQs
    • Personal Injury Legal Fees
    • Personal Injury Infographic
    • Schedule Initial Consultation
  • Client Reviews
    • What Our Clients Say
    • Client Ratings
    • Video Client Testimonials
    • Customer Satisfaction Survey
    • Facebook Testimonials
    • Client Succes Stories
    • Write/Read Client Reviews
    • Schedule Initial Consultation
  • About Us
    • Our Firm
      • Firm Overview & Mission
      • Our 5 Principles
      • Working Philosophy
      • Practice Areas
      • Video Client Testimonials
      • Why Hire Us
      • Our Legal Fees
    • Preparing to Meet With Us
      • Intake Form for Consultation
      • Communication Policy
      • Records Management and Retention Policy
      • Published Court Decisions
      • Customer Satisfaction Survey
      • Client Success Stories
      • Events
    • Our Team
      • Legal
      • Administrative
    • Careers
      • Newsletters
      • Send Us Your Feedback
      • Directions to Our Office
    • Blog
    • Schedule Initial Consultation
  • FAQs
    • Frequently Asked US Immigration Questions
    • Frequently Asked Criminal Defense Questions
    • Frequently Asked Personal Injury Questions
    • Schedule Initial Consultation
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
martine - client testimonial
Play Video
Martine: "My experience with FitzGerald & Company has been tremendously rewarding… they’ve helped me get my green card. He (Desmond) was always very realistic... He would never paint a picture more beautiful… would never say you get something within a month and then take a year..."
More
william - client testimonial
Play Video
William: "What I liked most about FitzGerald & Company is that they excel at professionalism.. the way they do their work, the communication with the clients.. When you call the office from the receptionist to the lawyer everything is well arranged..
More
alistair - client testimonial
Play Video
Alistair: "Came in originally with an H-1 b working visa.. and at one stage I had to apply for an E-1 investor visa which allowed me to start my own company. What I liked most about working with FitzGerald & Company was that the team that I worked with really got to understand my situation.."
More
ahmed - client testimonial
Play Video
Ahmed: "I have known Mr. FitzGerald for 9 years.. and he has always been there for me. The staff has been great as well, communicating with me through mail and phone. Billing has never been a problem with Mr. FitzGerald.. and of course He has succeeded and got the job done every time he worked with me.." More
isaac - client testimonial
Play Video
Issac: "They were there to support me on my case from day one.. always available if you call them.. always there if you have any concerns. Willing to walk with you throught the case.. I have recommended my friends to FitzGerald & Company, because I feel they will be treated the way I was treated and I was very happy.."
More
Previous Next
Home / Our Firm / Precedent & Important Published Decisions:

Precedent & Important Published Decisions:

Tobon-Marin v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 28 (1 st Cir. 2008)

Court decided that threatening conduct by terrorist groups must be politically motivated to win asylum.
The First Circuit Court of Appeals established a precedent decision on our clients’ asylum case, stating that coercive practices by the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) in attempting to conscript individuals for their guerrilla group did not trigger an entitlement to political asylum under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(42)(A), unless specific evidence is provided that the FARC targeted the individuals due to their pro-government or anticommunist political views.

Piedrahita v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 142 (1 st Cir. 2008)

Court decided that credibility determinations must be addressed in an asylum appeal.
The First Circuit Court of Appeals established a precedent decision on our clients’ asylum case, stating that a petition for review of the BIA’s dismissal of an asylum claim under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1158, must address an adverse credibility determination in order to prevail.

Escobar v. Chertoff , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40052 (D. Mass. 2008)

Court ruled that USCIS may not independently decide an N-400 (citizenship petition) after a lawsuit is filed. 
A Leal Permanent Resident client of the firm applied for citizenship. After waiting the proper time for a decision (120 days) without obtaining a response, we filed a law suit in Federal Court to have her naturalization decided by a judge instead of the USCIS, in order to avoid further delay. Soon after, the USCIS denied her naturalization petition and we argued that at this time the USCIS did not have the right to decide her case, as it was before the US District Court. The US District Court decided in our favor and ruled that once a law suit is filed in Federal Court, the USCIS may not continue to process an application independently.

Li v. Chertoff, 490 F. Supp. 2d 130 (2007 U.S. Dist.)

Citizenship allowed for person temporarily outside the US.
An individual who was a Legal Permanent Resident in the U.S. applied for naturalization with the USCIS (U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services) and then went to Canada to pursue an opportunity to study in a university’s dental program. While she attempted to complete her naturalization application before her departure date, but it was unreasonably delayed by the USCIS. Even though she obtained resident status in Canada she always maintained her Legal Permanent Resident status in the U.S. We argued that despite the fact she was temporarily residing in Canada she was still eligible to be granted citizenship in the U.S. and the court found in our favor.

Naoum v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28813 (D. Mass. Apr. 19, 2007)

Court ruled that it has the authority to order a government agency to produce records. 
After we filed a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request to produce records held by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on behalf of a client, and the DHS failed to produce the records, we filed an action in the Federal Court to force DHS to comply with our request. DHS claimed that we could not use a court order to force them to produce records in these circumstances, however the court ruled in our favor and determined that the Freedom of Information Act confers it jurisdiction to order a government agency like the DHS to produce records that were improperly withheld after a proper request was filed.

Osunsanya v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Servs. , 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9474, 2007 WL 484864 (D. Mass. 2007) also published in Benders Immigration Journal [http://www.bibdaily.com/pdfs/Osunsanya%202-12-07.pdf]

Court confirms its authority to review I-130 petitions (petitions for alien relative) 
A plaintiff filed a writ of mandamus against the U.S.C.I.S. (U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services) because it was taking more than 2 years to adjudicate his green card application (immigration has to adjudicate applications in a timely manner). After he filed his complaint, he alleged that USCIS threatened his wife and coerced her into signing documents that provided the grounds for the denial of his residency application. After denying his residency application, immigration moved to dismiss his law suit, stating that the court no longer had jurisdiction to review the matter because his application had been denied and therefore the adjudication was complete. Our office filed an opposition to immigration’s motion dismiss and convinced the court that because the denial was allegedly based on improper government conduct, it is invalid and the District Court has jurisdiction to review the matter. The court ruled in our favor.

Krazoun v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 208 (1st Cir. 2003)

Court established documentation requirements to reopen a deportation/removal based upon a new marriage to a US citizen. 
An alien who was deported from the United States, subsequently married a U.S. citizen. He applied to have his deportation case reopened based upon his marriage and the Board of Immigration appeals denied his request. This denial was appealed to the First Circuit Court of Appeals and the court ruled, in a precedent establishing decision, that the denial of an alien’s motion to reopen deportation proceedings based upon marriage to a U.S. Citizen is only proper if (1) the alien fails to establish the bona fides of the marriage pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 204.2(a) or (2) if in its discretion the government’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious nor predicated upon a misinterpretation of applicable law.

Commonwealth v. Todd , 1999 Mass. Super. LEXIS 572 (Mass. Super. Ct. Dec. 30, 1999).

Court confirmed the right to receipt of notice of a restraining order
A restraining order was obtained against a defendant; however, the order was never served on him. Subsequently, the defendant and two friends, took his child without permission, and attempted to return to Florida with his child. Our office filed a motion to dismiss charges related to the violation of the restraining order, since there was no evidence that the restraining order had been served on our client. The court found in our favor, because the grand jury heard no evidence relating to the defendant’s knowledge of the terms of the restraining order, and therefore the evidence was insufficient to sustain the indictment for violation of a restraining order. (Mass. Gen. Laws chapter 209A, § 7.)

Other Published Decisions:

  1. Riga wood North America, Inc. Employer, On Behalf of Raimonds Svanks, Alien , Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals, U.S. Department of Labor, 2010-PER-00218 (April 2010)
  2. Bocova v. Haydon ,  2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35028 (2009 MA U.S. Dist. Ct.)
  3. Ore v. Clinton , 675 F. Supp. 2d 217 (D. Mass. 2009)
  4. Azziz v. Chertoff , 27 F. Supp. 2d 188 (2007 MA U.S. Dist. Ct.)
  5. Sandhu v. Gonzales , 185 Fed. Appx. 4 (1 st Cir. 2006)
  6. Osorno v. Gonzales , 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6768 (1 st Cir. March 10, 2006)
  7. Mana v. Gonzales , 128 Fed. Appx. 167 (1 st Cir. 2005)
  8. Betancur Lopez v. Gonzales , 192 Fed. Appx. 19 (1st Cir. 2006)
  9. Caballero v. Gonzales , 130 Fed. Appx. 487 (1 st Cir. 2005)

Stay Informed
Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Newsletter

Get to Know Us Video

Get to Know Us

Client satisfaction
Client rating

About Us

  • Firm Overview & Mission
  • Our 5 Principles
  • Working Philosophy
  • Practice Areas
  • Video Client Testimonials
  • Why Hire Us
  • Our Fee Structure
  • Preparing to Meet With Us
  • Intake Form for Consultation
  • Communication Policy
  • Records Management and Retention Policy
  • Published Court Decisions
  • Client Success Stories

Schedule your initial consultation today. Call 617-303-2600 (ext. 0)

StatisticsReview of Fitzgerald & Co

Call to schedule an
appointment today

617-303-2600

Serving clients in Massachusetts
and surrounding areas.

Benefits of Appointment

  • Learn your legal options
  • Understand your risks
  • Make well informed decisions
Online Appointment Request

Authorization of email use

Call to schedule an
appointment today

617-303-2600

Serving clients in Massachusetts
and surrounding areas.

Benefits of Appointment

  • Learn your legal options
  • Understand your risks
  • Make well informed decisions
Online Appointment Request

Authorization of email use

BBB Acredited Business 2014 Member peerrated 2019 best personal injury 2020 best immigration attorney 2020 best criminal defense attorney badge 2020 10 best immigration attorneys Top Somerville Car Accident Lawyers

FitzGerald Law Company (also know as “FitzGerald & Company” or “FitzGerald & Company, LLC.” )
185 Devonshire Street, Suite 601 Boston, MA 02110 (617) 523-6320

Site Map – Find The Page You Are Looking For | Blog | Privacy Policy

FitzGerald Law Company serves the following Massachusetts communities: Suffolk County including Boston, Jamaica Plain, Chelsea and Revere; Middlesex County including Cambridge, Framingham, Lowell, Malden, Everett, Newton, Somerville, and Waltham; Norfolk County including Quincy, Brookline, Weymouth and Randolph; Essex County including Haverhill, Lawrence, Lynn, Peabody, and Salem; Worcester County including Fitchburg, Leominster, Shrewsbury and Worcester; and Plymouth County including Bridgewater, Brockton and Plymouth.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this Web site is general in nature and subject to change at any point in time. As such, it may not necessarily apply to all situations. Therefore, under no circumstance it should be construed as legal advice. Please ensure that you consult with an attorney regarding your specific situation before starting a legal process.

Authorization of email use

By providing your email address you authorize us to communicate with you via email, and include you in our monthly eNewsletter's distribution list. For more information, please visit our Privacy Policy page.

Online Appointment Request
  • Immigration
  • Criminal
  • Personal Injury
Modal title

Schedule your initial consultation today. Call 617-303-2600 (ext. 0)

 

fitzgerald law company

Receive Our FitzGerald Law Company eNewsletter for:

  • Information on immigration Options
  • Client Success Stories
  • Important immigration Law Changes
  • Answers to Immigration, Criminal and PI FAQs
  • Events, important announcements, resources and tips
  • Which of our practice areas are you interested in? (you may select more than one)
  • Your email will be kept completely confidential
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

×